|
Cotton is one of the most chemically
intensive among all field crops. Cotton is grown on an estimated 3% of the
total cultivated area in the world, but uses about 25% of all insecticides
consumed in agriculture. Pests are such a serious threat to cotton
production that economic yields are almost impossible to achieve without
monitoring pests and adopting chemical controls.
Plant protection operations have become the crucial aspect of production
practices and pesticides that are banned for use on food crops are commonly
used on cotton. In many countries, especially where cotton is machine
picked, herbicides, insecticides, growth regulators and harvest aid
chemicals in addition to fertilisers are integral parts of production
practices.
Even after harvesting, cotton fabric at textile mills is treated with a
variety of chemicals for improving appearance and performance. Cotton
fabrics are often processed with toxic dyes and formaldehydes before they
reach end users. Growing cotton without synthetic fertilisers and other
chemicals has been termed green, environment friendly, biodynamic, etc, but
organic production is the most popular name used in the cotton industry.
Organic cotton production is a system of growing cotton without synthetic
chemical fertilisers, herbicides, conventional synthetic insecticides,
growth regulators, growth stimulators, boll openers or defoliants. It is a
system that contributes to healthy soils and/or people. The organic system
promotes enhanced biological activity, encourages sustainability and
commands proactive management of production.
Organic cotton
Organic cotton is grown using methods and materials that have a low impact
on the environment. Organic production systems replenish and maintain soil
fertility, reduce the use of toxic and persistent pesticides and fertilisers,
and build biologically diverse agriculture. Third-party certification
organisations verify that organic producers use only methods and materials
allowed in organic production.
Organic cotton is grown and processed without toxic chemicals that can be
absorbed easily when in contact with the user's skin. Pesticides,
fertilisers and chemicals used to grow and process conventional cotton
fabrics may go directly to the users blood stream, which consequently
affects the body's organs and tissues.
Organic cotton production is not simply an elimination of fertilisers and
insecticides but it is a complete production system, which requires equally
sound knowledge of cotton production practices. With respect to insect
control in particular, a thorough knowledge of non-chemical means of insect
control is a pre-requisite for organic production.
Use of chemicals in the form of fertilisers, herbicides, insecticides,
growth regulators, defoliants and desiccants has increased the cost of
production to the extent that cotton is losing its profitability against
other field crops. Environmental concerns are also increasing. Organic
cotton production provides an alternative to grow cotton without chemicals.
Organic cotton production requires careful planning so as to realise optimum
yield. It includes a number of factors like site selection, crop rotations,
variety, weed control, non-chemical means of insect control and skill to
manage organic crop. Similarly, there is a need to perfect the agronomic
requirements of a crop to be grown without synthetic fertilisers and
pesticides.
Besides, the naturally soft organic cotton fabric is a lot more comfortable
to use and is available at competitive prices.
Some facts:
-
Many chemicals used in conventional
farming were first developed for warfare.
-
A source says that 25 million people
worldwide are poisoned by pesticides every year.
-
25% of the pesticides and
fertilisers used in the world are sprayed in conventional cotton crops.
-
Over 0.75 kg of toxic chemicals are
used to grow the cotton needed for a conventional cotton sheet set and
about 0.5 kg to make a T-shirt and pair of jeans.
Among all the pesticides used, roughly 65% of the chemicals are used
against insects, 20% are herbicides, 14% are defoliants and growth
regulators while fungicides and others comprise only 1% of the total
toxic chemicals used on cotton.
Reasons for organic cotton production
Organic cotton production is also a consumer driven initiative. There are
many harmful chemicals that people do not know about. Twelve of these
chemicals are known as persistent organic pollutants or POPs, which are the
most hazardous of all man-made products or wastes that cause deaths, birth
defects and diseases among humans and animals. They are so dangerous that
120 nations agreed at a United Nations Environment Programme conference to
outlaw them. Of the 151 signatories to the convention 98 states have
ratified it; sadly the United States and Russia have not yet done so. There
are three of those chemicals used in cotton manufacturing. The following are
the main factors responsible for organic cotton production:
-
Concern for the environment: Fertilisers
and pests applied to the soil, but all the chemicals are not taken up by
the cotton plant. Some elements are released into the environment while
others leach into the soil and also pollute water.
-
Concern for family health:
Danger of Insecticide inhalation by the spray men during back mounted
manual spraying without any protective equipment.
-
Lifestyle: Some people were
interested in insecticide free cotton apparel due to allergies.
-
To reduce input prices:
Insecticide use changed the insect complex in many countries. Some minor
insects became major and certain new insects were introduced.
Consequently, there was an increase in the consumption of insecticides.
Organic cotton: An overview
Cotton is the most widely used natural-fibre cloth in clothing today. It
accounts for almost 50% of the textile market worldwide. It is used to make
a number of textile products. These include bath towels and robes, denim,
shirts, socks, underwear, T-shirts, bed-sheets, etc.
Cotton in food
Cotton in textile
-
T-shirts, Shirts
-
Trousers
-
Underwear
-
Vests
-
Socks
-
Baby wear
-
Towels
-
Bathrobes
-
Denim
-
Bed-sheet
-
Napkins
-
Diapers
The cottonseed meal that is left is
generally fed to livestock. As much as two-thirds of cotton crop can creep
into the food chain. Each year, half a million tons of cottonseed oil make
their way into salad dressings, baked goods and snack food; another three
million tons of raw cottonseed are fed to beef and dairy cattle.
Globally, nearly 90 million acres of cotton are grown in more that 70
countries. It is estimated that little over 8,000 hectares of organic cotton
are grown in various countries, the USA being the largest producer in the
world. Organic cotton is produced in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Ecuador,
Egypt, Greece, India, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, Senegal, Tanzania, Turkey
and Uganda.
Organic cotton vs conventional cotton
Conventional cotton: A danger to human life
-
Cotton uses about 25% of the world's
insecticide and more than 10% of the pesticide (including insecticides,
fungicides, herbicides, defoliants).
-
In the United States, 25% of all
pesticides used are applied to cotton.
-
It takes about a third of a pound of
synthetic fertilisers and pesticides to grow enough cotton for a
T-shirt.
-
Five of the top nine pesticides used
on cotton are cancer-causing chemicals (cyanazine, dicofol, naled,
propargite, and trifluralin).
-
All of the top nine cotton
pesticides in California are labeled by the US Environmental Protection
Agency as Category I or Category II materials, the most toxic
classifications.
-
In India, 91% of male cotton farm
workers regularly exposed to pesticides eight hours or more per day
experience some type of health disorder, including chromosomal
aberrations, cell death and cell decay.
Organic cotton: A healthy way of life
The good news is that positive alternatives to conventional cotton and
its related businesses are available. Over the past decade, a small number
of farmers and manufacturers have pioneered the market for organically grown
cotton, producing fibres and clothing while significantly reducing toxic
chemicals.
Difference between organic and conventional cotton.
| Criteria |
Conventional |
Organic |
| Seed preparation |
Treatment of
seed with fungicide of insecticide.
|
Uses
untreated seeds |
|
Use
of GMO (BT) seeds. |
NO
use of GMO/BT |
| Soil & Water |
Applies
synthetic fertilizers. |
Uses
bio fertilizers like cow dung. |
|
Loss
of soil due to MONO crop culture |
Strengthens
soil through crop rotation |
| Weed control |
Applies
herbicides and insecticides. |
Physical
removal of weeds and bio-pesticides. |
|
Repeated
application infecting air, water and soil |
Use
of mechanical and hand methods and totally harmless. |
| Pest control |
Heavy
use of insecticides. Consumes about 25% of world's total
insecticides. |
Use
of natural predators to kill insects. |
|
Use
pesticides which are highly toxic and carcinogenic. |
Uses
beneficial insects to control pests. |
|
Use
of spray which affects air, water and also affects human life and
nature. |
Use
of trap crop to control pests. |
| Harvesting |
Defoilates
with toxic chemicals. |
Natural
defoilation |
Organic cotton: Market Potential
In 1998, Nike, one of the largest sports
clothing lines in the world, decided to incorporate organic practices. Most
of their products contain 3-5% organic fibres and they also offer a 100%
organic line. Although 3-5% may seem insignificant, in the scheme of things
(and in the volume that Nike is producing) the numbers are quite large. Nike
alone uses nearly three-million pounds of organic cotton per year! And other
large companies such as Patagonia, Timberland, and Orvis also incorporate
organic fibres into their clothing lines; without public support these
companies would not be successful.
-
Organic has caught on US & EU
consumers like wild fire: The sales have been reported to increase
over more than 300% in last five years. Moreover, the projections are
even more bullish and the sales are expected to increase by about 1000%
by 2008.
-
Proven business models: Patagonia
in Ventura, California, and Nike, in Beaverton, Oregon are just two of
the examples of companies who have pioneered the organic cotton market
and are sharing their expertise with the Cleaner Cotton Campaign.
-
More and more brands joining the
league: Next, Adidas, M & S, Roots, Cotton Ginny, Target,
Walmart.
-
Consumer preference: Market
analysts report that consumers expect corporate responsibility as a
matter of basic business practices. Organic cotton is a great way to
implement it.
-
Increasing production and
availability: Global organic cotton production has increased
rapidly, keeping pace with its increasing demand. From 99-00 the
production has increased 4 times with India taking lead and in 05-06 it
is expected to be highest producer of Organic cotton.
-
Forthcoming regulations: Possible
bans on the most toxic agricultural chemicals, as well as potential
regulations about labeling on genetically engineered products, point to
the need to develop sustainable, practical solutions for cotton.
-
Quality product differentiation: Most
consumers who care about the environment also care about quality;
organic cotton fibres provide the opportunity for market
differentiation, particularly among companies with a high-quality brand
image.
-
A cleaner approach: Each
T-shirt made from one hundred per cent organic cotton saves one-third of
a pound of synthetic fertilisers and farm chemicals.
Limitations to organic production
There are many reasons why organic cotton production has not extended to
other countries. Nineteen countries tried to produce organic cotton during
the 1990s. But many of them have already stopped, not for lack of desire or
demand for such cotton, but for economic reasons. Insecticides need to be
eliminated from the cotton production system because they are dangerous to
apply, have long-term consequences on the pest complex, and deleterious
effects on the environment. Also, heavy reliance on pesticide use has pushed
many countries out of cotton production.
The following factors have limited the expansion of organic cotton
production:
-
Suitable varieties.
-
Fertiliser use.
-
Pest control.
-
Production technology.
-
Lack of information on cost of
production.
-
Price premium.
-
Need for alternate inputs.
-
Tied crop rotations.
-
Non-organic genetically engineered
cotton.
-
Certification.
-
Marketing.
Conclusion
The concern for a life devoid of the use of extremely harmful toxic
chemicals, the need for an eco-friendly industrial and agricultural culture
and an increasing awareness of depleting natural resources and the
consequences therein; these are factors which are shaping the lifestyles of
people worldwide. It is in this context that the relevance of organic cotton
becomes important.
Organic cotton is not only better for our bodies but better for our
environment. It makes a world of difference in the health and comfort of our
people, especially those with allergies, asthma, or multiple chemical
sensitivities. Especially infants can enjoy the purest softness, comfort and
strength of cotton while diminishing the harm to our environment because
what is toxic to you is 15 times more toxic to a baby. Not only do these
synthetic pesticides pollute our air, water and soil, but they jeopardise
our future.
The conventional cotton farming takes an astonishing amount of the
responsibility for contaminating our planet by using a full quarter of the
pesticides worldwide. Twenty thousand deaths can be accredited to poisoning
by farming pesticides; three million people suffer from chronic health
problems reported by The World Health Organisation. We know it's alarming!
References
-
Organic Cotton Production - 3, The
ICAC Recorder, June 1996.
-
Organic Cotton Production - 4, The
ICAC Recorder, December 1998.
-
Limitations on Organic Cotton
Production, The ICAC Recorder, March 2003.
-
Suitable Varieties for Organic
Cotton Production, by M Rafiq Chaudhry, Head, Technical Information
Section, ICAC, at the International Conference on Organic Cotton, Cairo,
Egypt, September 23-25, 1993.
-
www.sushantorganics.com/organiccotton.
-
www.csipl.net/templates/maral/innovation
-
www.mygoodnessduds.com.
Note: For detailed version of this
article please refer the print version of The Indian Textile Journal
November 2007 issue.
R Senthil Kumar
Department of Textile Technology,
Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi.
|